2. In the second video, her skin was whitened and thinned, her body was made longer, and her face was touched up.
3. In the third video, her body was dramatically thinned to a point (in my opinion) to where it didn't look natural. Her cellulite was removed, hair was made longer, and her face seemed to change along with everything else.
4. I don't think so because thats putting up someone who isn't them, they begin advertising a different model who doesn't exist.
5. Women seem to not notice because the repetition of how beautiful the models look in the magazines seem very consistent, thus putting on a beauty standard that isn't possible without photo manipulation. Now causing woman to feel out of place when they don't look like how the models do.
6. I am sure if a couple of blemishes were removed, it wouldn't be a big deal. Though drastically changing an overweight woman to a very thin being doesn't seem acceptable
7. Journalism is only for real life events and documenting them to show the world. Fashion is more for enjoyment.
8. We expect women o look this way because of some of the things that the magazines say like:
"BECOME MORE BEAUTIFUL WITH THIS SIMPLE TRICK"
'HOW TO LOSE WEIGHT FAST"
"BEST JEANS FOR YOUR BODY"
"375 WAYS TO TOTALLY LOOK HOT THIS FALL"
9. To show us how manipulated most magazines can be and to show how the women in the photos are not portrayed truthfully
10. Women seem to have a more unrealistic standard on them. It becomes a sexist problem that women are needed to look a certain way. Men have a more realistic standard that could be achieved with effort, though women cannot enlarge their eyes, thin their necks, and magically erase all fat on their bodies. Both genders can try to be "magazine beautiful", but it is an unreal standard.
No comments:
Post a Comment